Skip to main content
Foresera
All Case Studies
Impact7 min read·Updated Feb 2026

She Couldn't Read Her Own Restraining Order

Illustration for She Couldn't Read Her Own Restraining Order
83%
of court PDFs are scanned images
4,500+
protective orders issued daily

On a Thursday afternoon in March, a woman we will call Danielle sat in her car in a courthouse parking lot with a nine-page PDF on her phone. It was a temporary protective order — the document that defined how far her ex-husband was required to stay from her home, her workplace, and her daughter's school. It specified hearing dates, conditions of contact, and what would happen if those conditions were violated. Every detail mattered. Danielle has been legally blind since she was nineteen. When she opened the PDF, VoiceOver returned nothing.

What Happens Next Is the Part That Should Bother You

Danielle's options at that point were the same options millions of people with disabilities face every day with inaccessible documents, except the stakes were her physical safety.

  • She could call the clerk's office and ask someone to read the order to her over the phone — stating her name, her case number, and the nature of the case to a stranger, in a building where her ex-husband had just been served.
  • She could ask a friend or family member to read it, sharing the details of a domestic violence case she had not yet chosen to disclose to anyone in her life.
  • She could wait until she could get to her assistive technology setup at home and hope that a larger screen reader could extract something the phone could not. It could not. A scanned image is a scanned image on every device.
  • Or she could do what the Equidox/NFB survey found most people who use screen readers eventually do: give up and move on without the information.

You Do Not "Move On" from a Restraining Order

You either know what it says or you are navigating a dangerous situation without the information the court gave you specifically so you could protect yourself.

This Is Not Rare

The National Center for State Courts has documented that the overwhelming majority of court systems still produce documents by printing and scanning — creating image-only PDFs with no underlying text. This is true for restraining orders, custody agreements, probation terms, eviction notices, and every other document the court system produces.

4,500+
Temporary protective orders issued daily in the U.S.
83%
Of court PDFs are scanned images with no text layer
67%
Of PDFs encountered by AT users are inaccessible
1 in 4
American adults has a disability

The Equidox/NFB survey found that 67% of PDFs encountered by people who use screen readers are partially or entirely inaccessible. Among the most commonly cited inaccessible document types were government forms, legal documents, and court filings.

The Moment It Becomes a Civil Rights Issue

A protective order is not informational. It is not a newsletter or a meeting agenda. It is a legal instrument that a person needs to understand in order to be safe. When a court issues that instrument in a format that excludes people with disabilities from reading it, the court has not just created an inconvenience. It has created a gap between the protection the law offers and the protection a person can actually use.

Title II of the ADA requires state and local government entities — including courts — to make their services, programs, and activities accessible to people with disabilities. The DOJ's 2024 rule extended this explicitly to all digital content, including downloadable documents. A scanned, untagged PDF of a protective order fails every accessibility requirement that exists.

No Screen Reader Can Read a Photograph

There is no assistive technology on earth that can extract text from a scanned image. The fix is not on the user's end. It never was.

What Accessible Court Documents Look Like

  • A real text layer that a screen reader can parse.
  • Tagged headings so the reader can navigate between sections — boundary conditions, hearing dates, exceptions, penalties.
  • A logical reading order so the content is announced in the sequence it was meant to be understood.
  • Form fields with labels, if the document requires any action from the recipient.

None of this is exotic technology. It is the same structure that exists in every properly created Word document. The gap is not capability. The gap is that no one in the process thought about the person on the other end.

The Person We Are Not Talking About

The conversation about document accessibility tends to center on compliance deadlines, penalty structures, and lawsuit risk. Those are real. They matter. But they are not the reason this matters.

The reason this matters is that there is a woman sitting in a parking lot who cannot read the document that tells her how to be safe. There is a man on probation who cannot confirm the terms he is required to follow. There is a parent in a custody dispute who cannot independently verify what a judge decided about their child.

These are not edge cases. One in four American adults has a disability. The population of Americans over 65 — among whom two in five have a disability — will outnumber children for the first time by 2030. The number of people who need documents to be accessible is not shrinking. It is the fastest-growing segment of the population.

What Can Be Done Right Now

Every scanned PDF that a court, county, or municipality publishes can be remediated. OCR technology can extract the text. Automated tagging can add structure. Alt text can describe visual elements. Reading order can be set to match the logical flow of the document. Foresera's pipeline handles all of this automatically.

The Math Is Simple

The cost of remediating a single document is measured in cents. The cost of not remediating it is measured in the things people cannot do with information they were legally entitled to have.

Key Takeaways

  • Court systems routinely produce scanned, image-only PDFs that are completely invisible to screen readers.
  • Protective orders, custody agreements, and probation terms are among the most consequential documents a person can receive — and among the least accessible.
  • Over 4,500 protective orders are issued daily in the U.S. An unknown but significant percentage are inaccessible.
  • Title II of the ADA requires courts to make all digital content accessible. The DOJ's 2024 rule made this explicit.
  • Remediation is fast, inexpensive, and available now. The barrier is not technology — it is awareness.

Sources & References

  1. 1Equidox/NFB — PDF Accessibility Survey Results
  2. 2National Domestic Violence Hotline — Orders of Protection Statistics
  3. 3National Center for State Courts — Court Technology Standards
  4. 4ADA.gov — Title II Web Accessibility Rule Fact Sheet
  5. 5CDC — Adults with Disabilities Data (2024)

A document someone needs to be safe should never be a document they cannot read.

If your organization publishes PDFs that people depend on — court orders, legal notices, government forms — Foresera can show you exactly what a screen reader sees when it opens them. Upload one document. See the gaps. Fix them automatically. Your first 5 pages are free.

Check a Document Now